No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
** {{i|6. The ''Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika'' Distinction in the History of Madhyamaka<br> Though (2006) |159}} | ** {{i|6. The ''Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika'' Distinction in the History of Madhyamaka<br> Though (2006) |159}} | ||
** {{i|7. Purport, Implicature, and Presupposition: Sanskrit ''abhiprāya'' and Tibetan<br> ''dgongs pa / dgongs gzhi'' as Hermeneutical Concepts (1985) | 195}} | ** {{i|7. Purport, Implicature, and Presupposition: Sanskrit ''abhiprāya'' and Tibetan<br> ''dgongs pa / dgongs gzhi'' as Hermeneutical Concepts (1985) | 195}} | ||
** {{i|8. An Indian Source for the Tibetan Hermeneutical Term ''dgongs gzhi'', "Intentional Ground" (1998) |213}} | ** {{i|8. An Indian Source for the Tibetan Hermeneutical Term ''dgongs gzhi'',<br> "Intentional Ground" (1998) |213}} | ||
** {{i|9. Some Reflections on the Place of Philosophy in the Study of Buddhism (1995) |217}} | ** {{i|9. Some Reflections on the Place of Philosophy in the Study of Buddhism<br> (1995) |217}} | ||
** {{i|10. On the Tibetan Historiography and Doxography of the "Great Debate of Bsam yas" (1992) |253}} | ** {{i|10. On the Tibetan Historiography and Doxography of the "Great Debate<br> of Bsam yas" (1992) |253}} | ||
** {{i|11. Autour du ''Lta ba'i khyad par'' de Ye shes sde (1979) |267}} | ** {{i|11. Autour du ''Lta ba'i khyad par'' de Ye shes sde (1979) |267}} | ||
** {{i|12. The Jo nang pas; A School of Buddhist Ontologists According to the ''Crystal Mirror of Philosophical Doctrines (Grub mtha' shel gyi me long)'' (1963)| 289}} | ** {{i|12. The Jo nang pas; A School of Buddhist Ontologists According to the<br> ''Crystal Mirror of Philosophical Doctrines (Grub mtha' shel gyi me long)'' (1963)| 289}} | ||
** {{i|13. A Karma Bka' brgyud Work on the Lineages and Traditions of the Indo-Tibetan ''dbu ma'' (Madhyamaka) (1988) |323}} | ** {{i|13. A Karma Bka' brgyud Work on the Lineages and Traditions of the Indo-<br> Tibetan ''dbu ma'' (Madhyamaka) (1988) |323}} | ||
** {{i|14. La Pensée Tibétaine (accompagné d'une traduction du ''Rten 'brel bstod pa legs bshad snying po'' de Tsong kha pa) (1989) |357}} | ** {{i|14. La Pensée Tibétaine (accompagné d'une traduction du ''Rten 'brel bstod pa<br> legs bshad snying po'' de Tsong kha pa) (1989) |357}} | ||
** {{i|15. The Indian and the Indic in Tibetan Cultural History, and Tsong kha pa's Achievement as a Scholar and Thinker: An Essay on the Concepts of "Buddhism in Tibet" and "Tibetan Buddhism" (2004) |375}} | ** {{i|15. The Indian and the Indic in Tibetan Cultural History, and Tsong kha pa's<br> Achievement as a Scholar and Thinker: An Essay on the Concepts of<br> "Buddhism in Tibet" and "Tibetan Buddhism" (2004) |375}} | ||
* {{i|English Glossary of Selected Terms| 399}} | * {{i|English Glossary of Selected Terms| 399}} | ||
* {{i|Publications by David Seyfort Ruegg| 407}} | * {{i|Publications by David Seyfort Ruegg| 407}} |
Latest revision as of 14:37, 2 September 2020
Madhyamaka, the "philosophy of the middle," systematized the Buddha's fundamental teaching on no-self with its profound non-essentialist reading of reality. Founded in India by Nāgārjuna in about the second century C.E., Madhyamaka philosophy went on to become the dominant strain of Buddhist thought in Tibet and exerted a profound influence on all the cultures of East Asia. Within the extensive Western scholarship inspired by this school of thought, David Seyfort Ruegg's work is unparalleled in its incisiveness, diligence, and scope. The Buddhist Philosophy of the Middle brings together Ruegg’s greatest essays on Madhyamaka, expert writings which have and will continue to contribute to our progressing understanding of this rich tradition. (Source: Wisdom Publications)
Citation | Ruegg, David Seyfort. The Buddhist Philosophy of the Middle: Essays on Indian and Tibetan Madhyamaka. Studies in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2010. |
---|---|