Buddha-Nature Timeline: Difference between revisions
From Buddha-Nature
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{TimelineEntry | {{TimelineEntry | ||
|date= | |date=792-794 CE | ||
|description= | |description=The Great Samye Debate between the Indian gradualists led by the Mādhyamika master [[Kamalaśīla]] and Chinese subitist led by Chan monk [[Mahāyāna]]. | ||
|layout=horizontal | |layout=horizontal | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{TimelineEntry | {{TimelineEntry | ||
|date= | |date=c. 800 CE | ||
|description= | |description=[[Yeshe De]] and others translate major Buddha-Nature ''sūtras'' such as the ''[[Tathāgatagarbhasūtra]]'' and ''[[Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra]]'' into Tibetan. | ||
|layout=horizontal | |layout=horizontal | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{TimelineEntry | {{TimelineEntry | ||
|date=By 1040 CE | |date=By 1040 CE | ||
|description=Maitrīpa (986-1063) is said to have discovered the texts of ''[[Ratnagotravibhāga]]'' and ''[[Dharmadharmatāvibhāga]]'' in a stupa. | |description=Maitrīpa (986-1063) is said to have discovered the texts of ''[[Ratnagotravibhāga]]'' and ''[[Dharmadharmatāvibhāga]]'' in a stupa. | ||
|layout=horizontal | |layout=horizontal | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{TimelineEntry | {{TimelineEntry | ||
|date=c. | |date=c. 1045 CE | ||
|description=[[Ratnavajra]], grandfather of [[Sajjana]] may have composed his commentary on the ''Ultimate Continuum''. | |description=[[Ratnavajra]], grandfather of [[Sajjana]] may have composed his commentary on the ''Ultimate Continuum''. | ||
|layout=horizontal | |layout=horizontal | ||
| Line 130: | Line 129: | ||
|date=c. 1150 CE | |date=c. 1150 CE | ||
|description=[[Lhodrak Dharma Senge]], for whom we do not have much information, composed his commentary on the ''Ultimate Continuum''. | |description=[[Lhodrak Dharma Senge]], for whom we do not have much information, composed his commentary on the ''Ultimate Continuum''. | ||
|layout=horizontal | |layout=horizontal | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 158: | Line 137: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{TimelineEntry | {{TimelineEntry | ||
|date=c. | |date=c. 1200 CE | ||
|description=[[ | |description=[[Jetsun Drakpa Gyaltsen]] composed his notes on the ''Ultimate Continuum'' entitled the ''Unmistaken Intent of Maitreya''. | ||
|layout=horizontal | |layout=horizontal | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{TimelineEntry | {{TimelineEntry | ||
|date=c. 1200 CE | |date=c. 1200 CE | ||
|description=[[ | |description=[[Drakpa Gyeltsen]], one of the Sakya hierarchs composed his synopsis of the 'Ultimate Continuum''. | ||
|layout= | |layout=vertical | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{TimelineEntry | {{TimelineEntry | ||
| Line 205: | Line 184: | ||
|date=c. 1340 | |date=c. 1340 | ||
|description=[[Tanak Rinchen Yeshe]], who was a teacher of both [[Tokme Zangpo]] and [[Dolpopa]], wrote his ''Illumination of the Definitive Meaning: A Commentary on the Uttaratantra in Relation to the Sūtras'' which presents an promo-''zhentong'' interpretation. | |description=[[Tanak Rinchen Yeshe]], who was a teacher of both [[Tokme Zangpo]] and [[Dolpopa]], wrote his ''Illumination of the Definitive Meaning: A Commentary on the Uttaratantra in Relation to the Sūtras'' which presents an promo-''zhentong'' interpretation. | ||
|layout=horizontal | |||
}} | |||
{{TimelineEntry | |||
|date=1474 CE | |||
|description=[[Shākya Chokden]] composed his ''Explanation of Buddhagarbha: An Essence of Sūtra and Tantra'' highlighting his position that real Buddha-Nature does not exist in sentient beings. | |||
|layout=horizontal | |||
}} | |||
{{TimelineEntry | |||
|date=1359 CE | |||
|description=[[Butön Rinchen Drup]] wrote his ''Ornament That Illuminates and Beautifies the Tathāgata Heart'' and underscored that the Buddha-Nature teachings are expedient provisional teachings and not to be taken literally. | |||
|layout=horizontal | |layout=horizontal | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 215: | Line 204: | ||
|date=c. 1350 CE | |date=c. 1350 CE | ||
|description=[[Sazang Mati Paṇchen Lodrö Gyeltsen]] improves the Tibetan translation of the ''Ultimate Continuum'' and writes his long exposition. | |description=[[Sazang Mati Paṇchen Lodrö Gyeltsen]] improves the Tibetan translation of the ''Ultimate Continuum'' and writes his long exposition. | ||
|layout=horizontal | |||
}} | |||
{{TimelineEntry | |||
|date=c. 1350 CE | |||
|description=[[Gyalse Tokme Zangpo]] wrote his commentary on the ''Ultimate Continuum'' illuminating the definitive meaning in E temple. | |||
|layout=horizontal | |||
}} | |||
{{TimelineEntry | |||
|date=c. 1400 CE | |||
|description=[[Rongtön Sheja Kunrik]] wrote his commentary on and practice manual for the ''Ultimate Continuum''. | |||
|layout=horizontal | |layout=horizontal | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 233: | Line 232: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{TimelineEntry | {{TimelineEntry | ||
|date= | |date=By 1899 CE | ||
|description= | |description=[[Jamgon Kongtrul Lodrö Taye]] wrote his experiential commentary on the ''Ultimate Continuum'' in which he presents the understanding of Other Emptiness. | ||
|layout=horizontal | |layout=horizontal | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{TimelineEntry | {{TimelineEntry | ||
|date=c. | |date=c. 1900 CE | ||
|description= | |description=Khenpo Zhenpen Chokyi Nangwa, also known as Zhenga, composed his annotated commentaries on the 13 great Indian treatises which came to be widely used in shedra curriculum. | ||
|layout=horizontal | |layout=horizontal | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{TimelineEntry | {{TimelineEntry | ||
|date= | |date=c. 1900 CE | ||
|description=[[ | |description=Khenpo Zhenga alias [[Zhenpen Chökyi Nangwa]] composed his interlinear commentary on the ''Ultimate Continuum'' as part of the thirteen great treatises. | ||
|layout=horizontal | |layout=horizontal | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{TimelineEntry | {{TimelineEntry | ||
|date= | |date=1983 CE | ||
|description=Khenpo | |description=The 69th Je Khenpo [[Gendun Rinchen]] composed his commentary on the ''Ultimate Continuum'' in Phajoding. | ||
|layout=horizontal | |layout=horizontal | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{TimelineEntry | {{TimelineEntry | ||
|date=c. | |date=c. 1990 CE | ||
|description=[[ | |description=[[Muge Samten Gyatso]] composed his commentary on the 'Ultimate Continuum]] as requested by one Lobzang Tashi but the commentary is incomplete due to his illness. | ||
|layout= | |layout=horizontal | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{TimelineEntry | {{TimelineEntry | ||
|date= | |date=2002 CE | ||
|description=[[ | |description=[[Troru Tsenam]] completed his commentary on the 'Ultimate Continuum'' which is based on the transcription of his lectures. | ||
|layout=horizontal | |layout=horizontal | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{#default_form:TimelineEntry}} | {{#default_form:TimelineEntry}} | ||
Revision as of 04:30, 2 May 2022
Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra (which Michael Radich dates as early as the 2nd Century) mentions tathāgathagarbha and used the term ātman to describe buddha-nature.
Tathāgatagarbhasūtra (as dated by Michael Zimmermann) and other scriptures later considered as sūtras teaching tathāgathagarbha were circulating and promoted the concept of buddha-nature.
Nāgārjuna wrote Dharmadhātustava and praised the sphere of reality as the basis of saṃsāra and nirvāṇa. He called it 'the element' and 'luminous mind' and claimed emptiness does not negate this nature.
Śrīmālādevīsiṃhanādanirdeśa (which may have been circulating as one of the most influential sūtras on buddha-nature) is said to have been translated into Chinese by Seng Fani. It claims buddha-nature 'is empty of adventitious stains but not empty of its limitless inseparable qualities'.
Mahābherīsūtra (which was translated into Chinese by Guṇabhadra) equates buddha-nature with dharmakāya. Anūnatvāpūrṇatvanirdeśaparivarta (which Jonathan Silk dates at least before the earliest 5th century) mentions how sentient beings, bodhisattvas and buddhas are three phase of the buddha-nature being impure, partially obscured and fully pure.
According to Takasaki, Ratnagotravibhāga, which Central Asian and Tibetan sources attribute to Maitreya and Chinese sources attributed to Sāramati, was composed.
Paramārtha translated the Awakening of Faith attributed to Aśvaghoṣa into Chinese and thereby promoting the concept of Original Enlightenment.
Tanyan wrote the first commentary on the Awakening of Faith, which was followed by some 170 other commentaries written in China, Japan and Korea.
The Great Samye Debate between the Indian gradualists led by the Mādhyamika master Kamalaśīla and Chinese subitist led by Chan monk Mahāyāna.
Yeshe De and others translate major Buddha-Nature sūtras such as the Tathāgatagarbhasūtra and Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra into Tibetan.
Maitrīpa (986-1063) is said to have discovered the texts of Ratnagotravibhāga and Dharmadharmatāvibhāga in a stupa.
Ratnavajra, grandfather of Sajjana may have composed his commentary on the Ultimate Continuum.
Atiśa Dīpaṅkara and Naktso Tsultrim Gyelwa translated the Ratnagotravibhāgauttaratantra or the Ultimate Continuum into Tibetan in Yerpa, Tibet.
Ngok Loden Sherab and Tsen Khawoche depart for Kashmir where they received teachings on works of Maitreya including the Ultimate Continuum from Sajjana.
Tsen Khawoche Drime Sherab, who received teachings on the Ultimate Continuum from Sajjana with the help of Zu Gawai Dorje as translator and returned to Tibet and taught the Ultimate Continuum in Tibet thereby starting the meditative tradition (སྒོམ་ལུགས་) of the Ultimate Continuum..
Ngok Loden Sherab translated the Ultimate Continuum with the help of Sajjana in Anupama town in Kashmir. He also composed his commentaries on the Ultimate Continuum and Sajjana wrote his instructions on the Ultimate Continuum.
Patsab Lotsāwa Nyima Drakpa, who introduced Prāsaṅgika Madhyamaka tradition to Tibet, and Marpa Dopa Chökyi Wangchuk, who is known for the transmission of Cakrasaṃvara to Tibet, translated the Ultimate Continuum. Maria Dopa also composed his commentary.
Chapa Chökyi Senge, the sixth abbot of Sangpu Neutok, composed his summary as well as detailed explanation of the Ultimate Continuum and carried on the philosophical legacy of Ngok Loden Sherab.
Lhodrak Dharma Senge, for whom we do not have much information, composed his commentary on the Ultimate Continuum.
Drogön Chögyal Pakpa wrote his synopsis of the Ultimate Continuum in the palace of Kubilai Khan in China.
Jetsun Drakpa Gyaltsen composed his notes on the Ultimate Continuum entitled the Unmistaken Intent of Maitreya.
Drakpa Gyeltsen, one of the Sakya hierarchs composed his synopsis of the 'Ultimate Continuum.
Sakya Paṇḍita Kuenga Gyeltsen critiqued the other theories of Buddha-Nature and presented Buddha-Nature as unchanging sphere of reality in his Distinguishing the Three Vows. He argued the Buddha-nature sūtras teaching innate enlightenment are provisional teachings.
Lodrö Tsungme of Sangpu Neutok composed his commentary on the Ultimate Continuum entitled The Precious Lamp That Illuminates the Definitive Meaning of the Mahāyāna Uttaratantra Treatise which is aligned to the interpretation in the meditative tradition.
Kyotön Mönlam Tsultrim, the eight abbot of Narthang, composed many works on Buddha-Nature including his Instructions on the Ultimate Continuum of the Mahāyāna and promoted the meditative tradition from Tsen Khawoche.
One Yarlung Lotsāwa, according to Gö Lotsāwa Zhönu Pal, is said to have translated the Ultimate Continuum.
Chomden Rikpai Raldri, the Narthang scholar, composed his Ornamental Flowers: A Commentary on the Mahāyāna Uttaratantra and explained Buddha-Nature to be an emptiness indivisible from awareness.
The third Karmapa Rangjung Dorje composed his Treatise on Pointing Out the Tathāgata Heart, commentary on Dharmadhātustava and other writings related to Buddha-Nature.
Dolpopa Sherab Gyeltsen wrote his tour de force Mountain Doctrine and many other works and he expounded the philosophy of zhentong or 'other-emptiness', in which conventional phenomena are empty of self existence and Buddha-Nature is the ultimate absolute reality endowed will all qualities of the Buddha.
Tanak Rinchen Yeshe, who was a teacher of both Tokme Zangpo and Dolpopa, wrote his Illumination of the Definitive Meaning: A Commentary on the Uttaratantra in Relation to the Sūtras which presents an promo-zhentong interpretation.
Shākya Chokden composed his Explanation of Buddhagarbha: An Essence of Sūtra and Tantra highlighting his position that real Buddha-Nature does not exist in sentient beings.
Butön Rinchen Drup wrote his Ornament That Illuminates and Beautifies the Tathāgata Heart and underscored that the Buddha-Nature teachings are expedient provisional teachings and not to be taken literally.
Longchenpa Drime Õzer composed his Seven Treasures, Trilogy of Relaxation and Trilogy of Liberation in which he presented Buddha-Nature as empty luminous nature of the mind.
Sazang Mati Paṇchen Lodrö Gyeltsen improves the Tibetan translation of the Ultimate Continuum and writes his long exposition.
Gyalse Tokme Zangpo wrote his commentary on the Ultimate Continuum illuminating the definitive meaning in E temple.
Rongtön Sheja Kunrik wrote his commentary on and practice manual for the Ultimate Continuum.
The eighth Karmapa Mikyö Dorje wrote his The Lamp That Excellently Elucidates the System of the Proponents of the Other-Emptiness Madhyamaka and other works and highlighted the understanding of 'expanse zhentong'.
Jamgon Kongtrul Lodrö Taye wrote his experiential commentary on the Ultimate Continuum in which he presents the understanding of Other Emptiness.
Khenpo Zhenpen Chokyi Nangwa, also known as Zhenga, composed his annotated commentaries on the 13 great Indian treatises which came to be widely used in shedra curriculum.
Khenpo Zhenga alias Zhenpen Chökyi Nangwa composed his interlinear commentary on the Ultimate Continuum as part of the thirteen great treatises.
The 69th Je Khenpo Gendun Rinchen composed his commentary on the Ultimate Continuum in Phajoding.
Muge Samten Gyatso composed his commentary on the 'Ultimate Continuum]] as requested by one Lobzang Tashi but the commentary is incomplete due to his illness.
Troru Tsenam completed his commentary on the 'Ultimate Continuum which is based on the transcription of his lectures.
