No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "།(.*)།" to "$1། །") |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|Variations={{VerseVariation | |Variations={{VerseVariation | ||
|VariationLanguage=Tibetan | |VariationLanguage=Tibetan | ||
|VariationOriginal= | |VariationOriginal=རྣམ་པར་མི་རྟོག་རང་བཞིན་ཕྱིར། །<br>གཉིས་མེད་ཆོས་ཉིད་ཞི་བའི་དོན། །<br>མ་བཅོས་ཡོན་ཏན་ཉིད་ཕྱིར་ན། །<br>འཇིག་མེད་དོན་ནི་གཡུང་དྲུང་ཉིད། ། | ||
|VariationOriginalSource=[https://adarsha.dharma-treasure.org/kdbs/degetengyur/pbs/2380997 Dege, PHI, 115] | |VariationOriginalSource=[https://adarsha.dharma-treasure.org/kdbs/degetengyur/pbs/2380997 Dege, PHI, 115] | ||
|VariationTrans=The meaning of being peaceful is its true nature of nonduality<br>Because it has the nature of being nonconceptual.<br>Being eternal has the meaning of being indestructible<br>Because it has the quality of being unfabricated. | |VariationTrans=The meaning of being peaceful is its true nature of nonduality<br>Because it has the nature of being nonconceptual.<br>Being eternal has the meaning of being indestructible<br>Because it has the quality of being unfabricated. |
Latest revision as of 11:55, 18 August 2020
Verse I.83.2 Variations
གཉིས་མེད་ཆོས་ཉིད་ཞི་བའི་དོན། །
མ་བཅོས་ཡོན་ཏན་ཉིད་ཕྱིར་ན། །
འཇིག་མེད་དོན་ནི་གཡུང་དྲུང་ཉིད། །
Because it has the nature of being nonconceptual.
Being eternal has the meaning of being indestructible
Because it has the quality of being unfabricated.
Puisqu’il a pour nature de ne pas penser. L’éternité, c’est l’indestructibilité, Puisqu’il n’a pas de qualités artificielles.
RGVV Commentary on Verse I.83.2
Tibetan
English
Sanskrit
Chinese
Full Tibetan Commentary
Full English Commentary
Full Sanskrit Commentary
Full Chinese Commentary
Other English translations
Obermiller (1931) [2]
- It is by nature devoid of (dialectical) construction,—
- This shows the meaning of “ the undialectical quiescent Absolute,
- Its properties are real, inartificial,—
- By this the meaning of "indestructible"(is explained).
Fuchs (2000) [3]
- Since absence of thought is its nature, it is dharmata
- free from duality and thus [has] the attribute of peace.
- Hosting uncreated qualities, it is immutability itself
- and thus [possesses] the attribute of indestructibility.
Textual sources
Commentaries on this verse
Academic notes
Karl Brunnhölzl
Here, DP[4] insert the following two verses:
- The meaning of being permanent is its character of not changing into anything other
- Because it has the quality of being inexhaustible.
- The meaning of being everlasting is its character of being a refuge
- Because it is equal to the final end.
- The meaning of being peaceful is its true nature of nonduality
- Because it has the nature of being nonconceptual.
- Being eternal has the meaning of being indestructible
- Because it has the quality of being unfabricated.
- Note that these two verses are inserted in an awkward place in DP since they are sandwiched between the sentence that ends in "according to the [Anūnatvāpūrṇatvanirdeśa]sūtra" (mdo ji lta ba bzhin shes par bya’o) and the words "As it is said: . . ." (ji skad du), which indicate the beginning of the actual quote from that sūtra. Also, the two verses seem somewhat redundant because they are almost verbatim identical to both Uttaratantra I.79 and the quote from the Anūnatvāpūrṇatvanirdeśasūtra that follows them. GC (380)[5] also notices the close similarity between the two verses and that sūtra quote and explicitly matches each of the two lines of these verses with the corresponding lines in the quote. In any case, Ut (DP) as well as all Tibetan commentaries consider these two verses to be part of the Uttaratantra.
- Brunnhölzl, Karl. When the Clouds Part: The Uttaratantra and its Meditative Tradition as a Bridge between Sūtra and Tantra. Boston: Snow Lion Publications, an imprint of Shambhala Publications, 2014.
- Obermiller, E. "The Sublime Science of the Great Vehicle to Salvation Being a Manual of Buddhist Monism." Acta Orientalia IX (1931), pp. 81-306.
- Fuchs, Rosemarie, trans. Buddha Nature: The Mahayana Uttaratantra Shastra. Commentary by Jamgon Kongtrul and explanations by Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso. Ithaca, N. Y.: Snow Lion Publications, 2000.
- D: Derge Tibetan Tripiṭaka. P: Peking Tibetan Tripiṭaka (Tokyo-Kyoto: Suzuki Research Foundation, 1956)
- GC: Gö Lotsāwa’s commentary on the Uttaratantra (’Gos lo tsā ba gzhon nu dpal 2003b)
No Tibetan commentary defined.