Verse III.22

Revision as of 14:25, 14 February 2020

Ratnagotravibhāga Root Verse III.22

Previous Verse

Next Verse

Verse III.22 Variations

प्रभूतजिव्हतानन्ताचिन्त्यरसरसाग्रता
कलविङ्करुतं ब्रह्मस्वरता च स्वयंभुवः

E. H. Johnston as input by the University of the West.^[1]

prabhūtajivhatānantācintyarasarasāgratā
kalaviṅkarutaṃ brahmasvaratā ca svayaṃbhuvaḥ

E. H. Johnston as input by the University of the West.^[2]

།ལྗགས་རིང་མཐའ་མེད་བསམ་མེད་པ།
།རོ་བྲོ་བ་ཡི་མཆོག་ཉིད་དང་།
།རང་བྱུང་ཀ་ལ་པིང་ཀ་ཡི།
།སྒྲ་དང་ཚངས་པའི་དབྱངས་ཉིད་དང་།

Dege, PHI, 132

His tongue is big and tastes the supreme taste,
Which is infinite and inconceivable.
The voice of the self-arisen is like that of a kalaviṅka [bird]
And has the melodious tone [of the voice] of Brahmā.

When the Clouds Part, Brunnhölzl, 433 ^[3]

Sa langue longue, infinie, inconcevable,

Donne un goût suprême à tous les aliments. De sa voix de Brahma, le Bouddha parle Avec des accents de kalaviṅka.

Charrier, Christian and Patrick Carré. Traité de la Continuité suprême du Grand Véhicule. Plazac: Éditions Padmakara, 2019.

RGVV Commentary on Verse III.22

Tibetan
English
Sanskrit
Chinese

Full Tibetan Commentary
Full English Commentary
Full Sanskrit Commentary
Full Chinese Commentary

།སྐྱེས་བུ་ཆེན་པོའི་མཚན་སུམ་ཅུ་རྩ་གཉིས་དང་ལྡན་པའི་གཟུགས་མངའ་བ་ཞེས་བྱ་བ་ནི། ལེགས་གནས་འཁོར་ལོས་མཚན་པ་དང་། །ཡངས་དང་ཞབས་ལོང་མི་མངོན་དང་། །སོར་མོ་རིང་དང་ཕྱག་ཞབས་རིང་། །དྲ་བ་ཡིས་ནི་འབྲེལ་བ་དང་། །པགས་འཇམ་གཞོན་ཤ་ཅན་ལེགས་ཉིད། །སྐུ་ནི་བདུན་དག་མཐོ་བ་དང་། །བྱིན་པ་ཨེ་ན་ཡ་འདྲ་གསང་། །གླང་པོ་བཞིན་དུ་སྦུབས་སུ་ནུབ། །རོ་སྟོད་སེང་གེ་འདྲ་བ་

དང་། །ཐལ་གོང་བར་མེད་རྒྱས་པ་དང་། །དཔུང་པ་ལེགས་ཟླུམ་ཕྱག་འཇམ་རིང་། །ཟླུམ་ཞིང་མཐོན་དམན་མེད་པ་དང་། །ཕྱག་རིང་ཡོངས་སུ་དག་པ་ཡི། །འོད་ཀྱི་དཀྱིལ་འཁོར་དག་དང་ལྡན། །མགྲིན་པ་དྲི་མེད་དུང་འདྲ་དང་། །འགྲམ་པ་རི་དགས་རྒྱལ་པོ་འདྲ། །ཚེམས་ནི་བཞི་བཅུ་མཉམ་པ་དང་། །རབ་དངས་ཚེམས་ཐགས་བཟང་བ་དང་། །རྣམ་དག་ཚེམས་མཉམ་ཉིད་དང་ནི། །མཆེ་བ་རབ་མཆོག་དཀར་བ་ཉིད། །ལྗགས་རིང་མཐའ་མེད་བསམ་མེད་པ། །རོ་བྲོ་བ་ཡི་མཆོག་ཉིད་དང་། །རང་བྱུང་ཀ་ལ་པིང་ཀ་ཡི། །སྒྲ་དང་ཚངས་པའི་དབྱངས་ཉིད་དང་། །སྤྱན་བཟངས་ཨུཏྤལ་ཁྱུ་མཆོག་རྫི་འདྲ་དང་། །ཞལ་མཛེས་དྲི་མེད་མཛོད་སྤུ་དཀར་བར་ལྡན། །གཙུག་ཏོར་དབུ་ལྡན་དག་ཅིང་སྲབ་པ་དང་། །པགས་པ་གསེར་གྱི་མདོག་འདྲ་སེམས་ཅན་མཆོག །བ་སྤུ་ལེགས་ཕྲ་འཇམ་ཞིང་རེ་རེ་ནས། །སྐུ་ཡི་གྱེན་དུ་གཡས་ཕྱོགས་འཁྱིལ་བ་དང་། །དབུ་སྐྲ་དྲི་མེད་རིན་ཆེན་མཐོན་མཐིང་བཞིན། །ནྱ་གྲོ་རྫོགས་པའི་ལྗོན་ཤིང་དཀྱིལ་འཁོར་འདྲ། །ཀུན་ཏུ་བཟང་པོ་དཔེ་མེད་དྲང་སྲོང་ཆེ། །སྲེད་མེད་བུ་ཡི་སྟོབས་མངའ་མཁྲེགས་པའི་སྐུ། །བསམ་མི་ཁྱབ་པར་སུམ་ཅུ་རྩ་གཉིས་པོ། །འདི་དག་སྟོན་པས་མི་དབང་མཚན་དུ་གསུངས།

Other English translations

Obermiller (1931) ^[14]

A long tongue, the best taste, infinite and unthinkable,

A voice self-originated and clear like that of the Kalavinka;

Takasaki (1966) ^[15]

His tongue is broad and long, [by which he tastes]

The highest taste, infinite and unthinkable;

The voice of the Self-Born is like that of the Kalaviṅka,

And has the most excellent sound.

Fuchs (2000) ^[16]

His tongue is long, his speech unlimited and inconceivable.

His sense of taste is supreme, and the Self-Sprung's voice

is like the kalavinka's call and the melody of Brahma.

Textual sources

Commentaries on this verse

Academic notes

Digital Sanskrit Buddhist Canon Unicode Input
Digital Sanskrit Buddhist Canon Unicode Input
Brunnhölzl, Karl. When the Clouds Part: The Uttaratantra and its Meditative Tradition as a Bridge between Sūtra and Tantra. Boston: Snow Lion Publications, an imprint of Shambhala Publications, 2014.
VT (fol. 15v1) adds that the hands are likewise marked with wheels.
Skt. aṅguli means both fingers and toes, and the following phrase "hands and feet" indicates both.
According to VT (fol. 15v1), "shoulders"refers to both arms and legs, thus obviously to shoulders and hips.
Skt. anunnāma, DP mtho dman med pa.
According to VT (fol. 15v2), the throat has lines like a conch.
According to VT (fol. 15v2), there are twenty teeth each in the upper and lower jaws.
According to VT (fol. 15v2), none are longer or shorter (lit. "high and low").
Ordinarily, kalaviṅka is a name of the red-green Indian sparrow and the Indian cuckoo alike. In Buddhist texts, however, it is usually considered as a mythical bird with the head of a human (a bodhisattva) and the body of a bird, which already sings marvelously before it breaks its shell. It is often said to live in Amitabha’s pure land Sukhāvatī.
In Hindu cosmology, this is the son of Mahāpuruṣa, the latter being the primeval man as the soul and original source of the universe. Also, Nārāyaṇa is variously identified as Brahmā, Viṣṇu, or Kṛṣṇa.
Obviously, the numerical breakdown of the marks into thirty-two in these verses is far from being clear, so different commentaries give different numberings and combine certain features into one (for the list of thirty-two and their causes in GC and RYC, which is based on the Ratnadārikāsūtra, see the note on III.17–25 in CMW). Note also that this list here is just one from among a considerable number of more or less differing lists of the thirty-two marks that are found in various sūtras and treatises (for comprehensive lists, see Xing 2002, 27 and Tan 2011, 146–62). Also, the comments on them and their causes vary in different texts. Despite claims to the contrary, there is no evidence that the major marks (or the minor marks) are of Brahmanic origin or even of early Buddhist origin (all Buddhist sources are quite late; see Tan 2011). As indicated below in the Uttaratantra, its list of the thirty-two major marks (which includes some marks that the Abhisamayālaṃkāra presents as minor marks) is based on the Ratnadārikāparipṛcchāsūtra (Taishō 397, 37b–c) and is also contained in the Anuttarāśrayasūtra (Taishō 669, 474a–b). Except for minor differences in counting, this list is also found in TOK (see Brunnhölzl 2011b, 457–58). For the different list of these marks and their causes in Abhisamayālaṃkāra VIII.13–17, which is based on the prajñāpāramitā sūtras, see Brunnhölzl 2011b, 117–21 (for the eighty minor marks, see 121–25) and Brunnhölzl 2012a, 378–84 and 531–33 (for the minor marks, see 384–88 and 533–37). Except for a few minor changes in the order and some additional features, the Abhisamayālaṃkāra ’s list is basically repeated in Nāgārjuna’s Ratnāvalī II.77–96, and II.98 adds that cakravartins also possess these marks but that their purity, beauty, and clarity matches not even a fraction of those of buddhas. Except for differences in the numbering, chapter 8 of the *Prajñāpāramitāśāstra (Taishō 1509, 90a–91a) ascribed to Nāgārjuna also follows the list in the Abhisamayālaṃkāra¨. For a comparison of the list in the Uttaratantra with the lists in Haribhadra’s Abhisamayālaṃkārālokā and the Mahāvyutpatti, see the notes in Takasaki 1966a on the translation of Uttaratantra III.17–25. For the most detailed presentations of the major marks apart from the prajñāpāramitā sūtras, see the Lakkhaṇasutta (Dīgha Nikāya III.142–79; translated in Walshe 1995, 441–60 and Tan 2011, 180–213; the latter also provides an overview of mainly Pāli sources of both the major and minor marks and discusses the potential Babylonian origin of the former) and the Arthaviniścayasūtra (Samtani 2002, 205–16), which however lists thirty-three marks. See also the Lalitavistarasūtra ([Berkeley: Dharma Publishing, 1983], 1:155–56), the Mahāvyutpatti (section 17, nos. 236–67; translated in Thurman 1976, 156), and Pawo Tsugla Trengwa’s commentary on the Bodhicaryāvatāra (Dpa’ bo gtsug lag phreng ba n.d., 720–23).
Obermiller, E. "The Sublime Science of the Great Vehicle to Salvation Being a Manual of Buddhist Monism." Acta Orientalia IX (1931), pp. 81-306.
Takasaki, Jikido. A Study on the Ratnagotravibhāga (Uttaratantra): Being a Treatise on the Tathāgatagarbha Theory of Mahāyāna Buddhism. Serie Orientale Roma 33. Roma: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente (ISMEO), 1966.
Fuchs, Rosemarie, trans. Buddha Nature: The Mahayana Uttaratantra Shastra. Commentary by Jamgon Kongtrul and explanations by Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso. Ithaca, N. Y.: Snow Lion Publications, 2000.

[1] Digital Sanskrit Buddhist Canon Unicode Input

[2] Digital Sanskrit Buddhist Canon Unicode Input

[3] Brunnhölzl, Karl. When the Clouds Part: The Uttaratantra and its Meditative Tradition as a Bridge between Sūtra and Tantra. Boston: Snow Lion Publications, an imprint of Shambhala Publications, 2014.

[4] VT (fol. 15v1) adds that the hands are likewise marked with wheels.

[5] Skt. aṅguli means both fingers and toes, and the following phrase "hands and feet" indicates both.

[6] According to VT (fol. 15v1), "shoulders"refers to both arms and legs, thus obviously to shoulders and hips.

[7] Skt. anunnāma, DP mtho dman med pa.

[8] According to VT (fol. 15v2), the throat has lines like a conch.

[9] According to VT (fol. 15v2), there are twenty teeth each in the upper and lower jaws.

[10] According to VT (fol. 15v2), none are longer or shorter (lit. "high and low").

[11] Ordinarily, kalaviṅka is a name of the red-green Indian sparrow and the Indian cuckoo alike. In Buddhist texts, however, it is usually considered as a mythical bird with the head of a human (a bodhisattva) and the body of a bird, which already sings marvelously before it breaks its shell. It is often said to live in Amitabha’s pure land Sukhāvatī.

[12] In Hindu cosmology, this is the son of Mahāpuruṣa, the latter being the primeval man as the soul and original source of the universe. Also, Nārāyaṇa is variously identified as Brahmā, Viṣṇu, or Kṛṣṇa.

[13] Obviously, the numerical breakdown of the marks into thirty-two in these verses is far from being clear, so different commentaries give different numberings and combine certain features into one (for the list of thirty-two and their causes in GC and RYC, which is based on the Ratnadārikāsūtra, see the note on III.17–25 in CMW). Note also that this list here is just one from among a considerable number of more or less differing lists of the thirty-two marks that are found in various sūtras and treatises (for comprehensive lists, see Xing 2002, 27 and Tan 2011, 146–62). Also, the comments on them and their causes vary in different texts. Despite claims to the contrary, there is no evidence that the major marks (or the minor marks) are of Brahmanic origin or even of early Buddhist origin (all Buddhist sources are quite late; see Tan 2011). As indicated below in the Uttaratantra, its list of the thirty-two major marks (which includes some marks that the Abhisamayālaṃkāra presents as minor marks) is based on the Ratnadārikāparipṛcchāsūtra (Taishō 397, 37b–c) and is also contained in the Anuttarāśrayasūtra (Taishō 669, 474a–b). Except for minor differences in counting, this list is also found in TOK (see Brunnhölzl 2011b, 457–58). For the different list of these marks and their causes in Abhisamayālaṃkāra VIII.13–17, which is based on the prajñāpāramitā sūtras, see Brunnhölzl 2011b, 117–21 (for the eighty minor marks, see 121–25) and Brunnhölzl 2012a, 378–84 and 531–33 (for the minor marks, see 384–88 and 533–37). Except for a few minor changes in the order and some additional features, the Abhisamayālaṃkāra ’s list is basically repeated in Nāgārjuna’s Ratnāvalī II.77–96, and II.98 adds that cakravartins also possess these marks but that their purity, beauty, and clarity matches not even a fraction of those of buddhas. Except for differences in the numbering, chapter 8 of the *Prajñāpāramitāśāstra (Taishō 1509, 90a–91a) ascribed to Nāgārjuna also follows the list in the Abhisamayālaṃkāra¨. For a comparison of the list in the Uttaratantra with the lists in Haribhadra’s Abhisamayālaṃkārālokā and the Mahāvyutpatti, see the notes in Takasaki 1966a on the translation of Uttaratantra III.17–25. For the most detailed presentations of the major marks apart from the prajñāpāramitā sūtras, see the Lakkhaṇasutta (Dīgha Nikāya III.142–79; translated in Walshe 1995, 441–60 and Tan 2011, 180–213; the latter also provides an overview of mainly Pāli sources of both the major and minor marks and discusses the potential Babylonian origin of the former) and the Arthaviniścayasūtra (Samtani 2002, 205–16), which however lists thirty-three marks. See also the Lalitavistarasūtra ([Berkeley: Dharma Publishing, 1983], 1:155–56), the Mahāvyutpatti (section 17, nos. 236–67; translated in Thurman 1976, 156), and Pawo Tsugla Trengwa’s commentary on the Bodhicaryāvatāra (Dpa’ bo gtsug lag phreng ba n.d., 720–23).

[14] Obermiller, E. "The Sublime Science of the Great Vehicle to Salvation Being a Manual of Buddhist Monism." Acta Orientalia IX (1931), pp. 81-306.

[15] Takasaki, Jikido. A Study on the Ratnagotravibhāga (Uttaratantra): Being a Treatise on the Tathāgatagarbha Theory of Mahāyāna Buddhism. Serie Orientale Roma 33. Roma: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente (ISMEO), 1966.

[16] Fuchs, Rosemarie, trans. Buddha Nature: The Mahayana Uttaratantra Shastra. Commentary by Jamgon Kongtrul and explanations by Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso. Ithaca, N. Y.: Snow Lion Publications, 2000.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 ::'''The teacher declared these thirty-two [marks]'''
 ::'''Of infinite splendor to be the signs of the lord of humans'''.<ref>Obviously, the numerical breakdown of the marks into thirty-two in these verses is far from being clear, so different commentaries give different numberings and combine certain features into one (for the list of thirty-two and their causes in GC and RYC, which is based on the ''Ratnadārikāsūtra'', see the note on III.17–25 in CMW). Note also that this list here is just one from among a considerable number of more or less differing lists of the thirty-two marks that are found in various sūtras and treatises (for comprehensive lists, see Xing 2002, 27 and Tan 2011, 146–62). Also, the comments on them and their causes vary in different texts. Despite claims to the contrary, there is no evidence that the major marks (or the minor marks) are of Brahmanic origin or even of early Buddhist origin (all Buddhist sources are quite late; see Tan 2011). As indicated below in the ''Uttaratantra'', its list of the thirty-two major marks (which includes some marks that the ''Abhisamayālaṃkāra'' presents as minor marks) is based on the ''Ratnadārikāparipṛcchāsūtra'' (Taishō 397, 37b–c) and is also contained in the ''Anuttarāśrayasūtra'' (Taishō 669, 474a–b). Except for minor differences in counting, this list is also found in TOK (see Brunnhölzl 2011b, 457–58). For the different list of these marks and their causes in ''Abhisamayālaṃkāra'' VIII.13–17, which is based on the prajñāpāramitā sūtras, see Brunnhölzl 2011b, 117–21 (for the eighty minor marks, see 121–25) and Brunnhölzl 2012a, 378–84 and 531–33 (for the minor marks, see 384–88 and 533–37). Except for a few minor changes in the order and some additional features, the ''Abhisamayālaṃkāra'' ’s list is basically repeated in Nāgārjuna’s Ratnāvalī II.77–96, and II.98 adds that cakravartins also possess these marks but that their purity, beauty, and clarity matches not even a fraction of those of buddhas. Except for differences in the numbering, chapter 8 of the ''*Prajñāpāramitāśāstra'' (Taishō 1509, 90a–91a) ascribed to Nāgārjuna also follows the list in the ''Abhisamayālaṃkāra''¨. For a comparison of the list in the ''Uttaratantra'' with the lists in Haribhadra’s ''Abhisamayālaṃkārālokā'' and the ''Mahāvyutpatti'', see the notes in Takasaki 1966a on the translation of ''Uttaratantra'' III.17–25. For the most detailed presentations of the major marks apart from the prajñāpāramitā sūtras, see the ''Lakkhaṇasutta'' (''Dīgha Nikāya'' III.142–79; translated in Walshe 1995, 441–60 and Tan 2011, 180–213; the latter also provides an overview of mainly Pāli sources of both the major and minor marks and discusses the potential Babylonian origin of the former) and the ''Arthaviniścayasūtra'' (Samtani 2002, 205–16), which however lists thirty-three marks. See also the ''Lalitavistarasūtra'' ([Berkeley: Dharma Publishing, 1983], 1:155–56), the ''Mahāvyutpatti'' (section 17, nos. 236–67; translated in Thurman 1976, 156), and Pawo Tsugla Trengwa’s commentary on the ''Bodhicaryāvatāra'' (Dpa’ bo gtsug lag phreng ba n.d., 720–23).</ref> III.25
+|OtherTranslations=<h6>Obermiller (1931) <ref>Obermiller, E. "The Sublime Science of the Great Vehicle to Salvation Being a Manual of Buddhist Monism." Acta Orientalia IX (1931), pp. 81-306.</ref></h6>
+:A long tongue, the best taste, infinite and unthinkable,
+:A voice self-originated and clear like that of the Kalavinka;
+<h6>Takasaki (1966) <ref>Takasaki, Jikido. [[A Study on the Ratnagotravibhāga (Uttaratantra): Being a Treatise on the Tathāgatagarbha Theory of Mahāyāna Buddhism]]. Serie Orientale Roma 33. Roma: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente (ISMEO), 1966.</ref></h6>
+:His tongue is broad and long, [by which he tastes]
+:The highest taste, infinite and unthinkable;
+:The voice of the Self-Born is like that of the Kalaviṅka,
+:And has the most excellent sound.
+<h6>Fuchs (2000) <ref>Fuchs, Rosemarie, trans. Buddha Nature: The Mahayana Uttaratantra Shastra. Commentary by Jamgon Kongtrul and explanations by Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso. Ithaca, N. Y.: Snow Lion Publications, 2000.</ref></h6>
+:His tongue is long, his speech unlimited and inconceivable.
+:His sense of taste is supreme, and the Self-Sprung's voice
+:is like the kalavinka's call and the melody of Brahma.
 }}