No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
|VariationTransSource=[[When the Clouds Part]], [[Brunnhölzl, K.|Brunnhölzl]], 374 <ref>[[Brunnhölzl, Karl]]. [[When the Clouds Part: The Uttaratantra and its Meditative Tradition as a Bridge between Sūtra and Tantra]]. Boston: Snow Lion Publications, an imprint of Shambhala Publications, 2014.</ref>
|VariationTransSource=[[When the Clouds Part]], [[Brunnhölzl, K.|Brunnhölzl]], 374 <ref>[[Brunnhölzl, Karl]]. [[When the Clouds Part: The Uttaratantra and its Meditative Tradition as a Bridge between Sūtra and Tantra]]. Boston: Snow Lion Publications, an imprint of Shambhala Publications, 2014.</ref>
}}
}}
|EnglishCommentary=[There follow] fourteen verses about (9) the topic of this tathāgata element’s being unchangeable by being afflicted or purified, despite being all-pervading throughout those three phases. The [following verse] is to be understood as the synopsis [that precedes] these [fourteen verses].
::'''Since it is adventitiously associated with flaws'''
::'''And since it is naturally endowed with qualities''',
::'''Its true nature of being changeless'''
::'''Is the same before as after'''. I.51
{J42} Since [the basic element] is '''adventitiously associated with''' the two flaws of afflictions and proximate afflictions during its phase of being impure and during its phase of being both impure and pure ([taught] by twelve [verses] and by one verse, respectively) '''and since it is naturally endowed''' during its phase of being completely pure with the inconceivable buddha qualities that far surpass the sand grains in the river Gaṅgā [in number], are inseparable [from this basic element], and [can]not be realized as being divisible [from it]<ref>VT (fol. 12v6) glosses "[can]not be realized as being divisible" as "they do not part from a tathāgata."</ref> ([taught] by the fourteenth verse),<ref>The references to the number of verses about the changelessness of buddha nature in each one of its three phases are rather confusing here since the twelve verses I.52–63 on the phase of its being impure are followed by two further verses (I.64–65) that elaborate on them. The one verse about its phase of being both impure and pure is then I.66, which is followed by twelve more explanatory verses (I.67–78). Finally, the one verse about its phase of being completely pure is I.79, again followed by four commentarial verses (I.80–83).</ref> it is explained that the tathāgata element '''has the true nature of being''' absolutely '''changeless before''' and later, just like the element of space.
|OtherTranslations=<h6>Obermiller (1931) <ref>Obermiller, E. "The Sublime Science of the Great Vehicle to Salvation Being a Manual of Buddhist Monism." Acta Orientalia IX (1931), pp. 81-306.</ref></h6>
|OtherTranslations=<h6>Obermiller (1931) <ref>Obermiller, E. "The Sublime Science of the Great Vehicle to Salvation Being a Manual of Buddhist Monism." Acta Orientalia IX (1931), pp. 81-306.</ref></h6>
:It is possessed of occasional defects
:It is possessed of occasional defects

Revision as of 14:08, 17 May 2019

Ratnagotravibhāga Root Verse I.51

Verse I.51 Variations

दोषागन्तुकतायोगाद् गुणप्रकृतियोगतः
यथा पूर्वं तथा पश्चादविकारित्वधर्मता
doṣāgantukatāyogād guṇaprakṛtiyogataḥ
yathā pūrvaṃ tathā paścādavikāritvadharmatā
E. H. Johnston as input by the University of the West.[1]
།ཉེས་པ་གློ་བུར་དང་ལྡན་དང་།
།ཡོན་ཏན་རང་བཞིན་ཉིད་ལྡན་ཕྱིར།
།ཇི་ལྟར་སྔར་བཞིན་ཕྱིས་དེ་བཞིན།
།འགྱུར་བ་མེད་པའི་ཆོས་ཉིད་དོ།
Since it is adventitiously associated with flaws
And since it is naturally endowed with qualities,
Its true nature of being changeless
Is the same before as after.
Vu le caractère adventice de ses défauts

Et le caractère naturel de ses qualités, Telle elle était, telle elle sera L’essence du réel est immuable.

RGVV Commentary on Verse I.51

Other English translations

Obermiller (1931) [5]
It is possessed of occasional defects
And of virtuous properties relating to its essence;
But in the initial and in the subsequent states
It remains the unalterable Absolute.
Takasaki (1966) [6]
Being possessed of faults by occasion,
It is, however, endowed with virtues by nature;
Therefore it is of unchangeable character
In the beginning as well as afterwards.
Fuchs (2000) [7]
Having faults that are adventitious
and qualities that are its nature,
it is afterwards the same as before.
This is dharmata ever unchanging.

Textual sources

Commentaries on this verse

Academic notes

  1. Digital Sanskrit Buddhist Canon Unicode Input
  2. Brunnhölzl, Karl. When the Clouds Part: The Uttaratantra and its Meditative Tradition as a Bridge between Sūtra and Tantra. Boston: Snow Lion Publications, an imprint of Shambhala Publications, 2014.
  3. VT (fol. 12v6) glosses "[can]not be realized as being divisible" as "they do not part from a tathāgata."
  4. The references to the number of verses about the changelessness of buddha nature in each one of its three phases are rather confusing here since the twelve verses I.52–63 on the phase of its being impure are followed by two further verses (I.64–65) that elaborate on them. The one verse about its phase of being both impure and pure is then I.66, which is followed by twelve more explanatory verses (I.67–78). Finally, the one verse about its phase of being completely pure is I.79, again followed by four commentarial verses (I.80–83).
  5. Obermiller, E. "The Sublime Science of the Great Vehicle to Salvation Being a Manual of Buddhist Monism." Acta Orientalia IX (1931), pp. 81-306.
  6. Takasaki, Jikido. A Study on the Ratnagotravibhāga (Uttaratantra): Being a Treatise on the Tathāgatagarbha Theory of Mahāyāna Buddhism. Serie Orientale Roma 33. Roma: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente (ISMEO), 1966.
  7. Fuchs, Rosemarie, trans. Buddha Nature: The Mahayana Uttaratantra Shastra. Commentary by Jamgon Kongtrul and explanations by Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso. Ithaca, N. Y.: Snow Lion Publications, 2000.