Authorship of the RGV: Difference between revisions

From Buddha-Nature
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
|rNgog's commentary (late 11th cent.) ||colspan="2"|Maitreya ||colspan="2"|Asaṅga(?)
|rNgog's commentary (late 11th cent.) ||colspan="2"|Maitreya ||colspan="2"|Asaṅga(?)
|-
|-
|colspan="5"|(modern scholars)
|colspan="5"|'''(modern scholars)'''
|-
|-
|Obermiller 1931 ||colspan="3"|Maitreya ||Asaṅga
|Obermiller 1931 ||colspan="3"|Maitreya ||Asaṅga

Revision as of 15:20, 6 January 2012

Authorship of the RGV
basic verse comm. verse prose comm.
Chinese tradition (ca. 511) Sāramati
Central Asia (ca. late 8th cent.) Maitreya (not mentioned)
Indian tradition (early 11th cent.) Maitreya
Tibetan tradition (late 11th cent.) Maitreya Asaṅga
rNgog's commentary (late 11th cent.) Maitreya Asaṅga(?)
(modern scholars)
Obermiller 1931 Maitreya Asaṅga
Tsukinowa 1936 Sāramati Maitreya Asaṅga
Johnston 1950 Sthiramati
Frauwallner 1956; Ui 1959 Sāramati
Nakamura 1961 Sāramati Vasubandhu
Takasaki 1966 (Maitreya ?) Sāramati
Seyfort Ruegg 1969 Maitreya = Sāramati Asaṅga

For the positions of modern scholars, see Tsukinowa 1936, Johnston 1950:xi, Frauwallner 1956:255, Ui 1959:89-97, Nakamura 1961, Takasaki 1966:6-9, Seyfort Ruegg 1969:46, Takasaki 1974:3-13, Takasaki 1989:392-397, Takasaki 1999:3-7. Takasaki (1999:15-18) concisely presents previous studies on the authorship of the RGV.