IIn this article Joseph Goldstein, a very experienced and influential Insight meditation teacher, explores his confusion about the apparent difference of opinion between different schools of Theravada Buddhism, Korean Ch’an and Dzogchen on the status of consciousness / awareness. His own tradition teaches consciousness is something transitory whilst Ch’an and Dzogchen believe awareness – pure awareness, rigpa, is the uncreated, unconditioned Buddha Nature, Tathagatagarbha. How can they both be right?
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|ArticleContent=IIn this article Joseph Goldstein, a very experienced and influential Insight meditation teacher, explores his confusion about the apparent difference of opinion between different schools of Theravada Buddhism, Korean Ch’an and Dzogchen on the status of consciousness / awareness. His own tradition teaches consciousness is something transitory whilst Ch’an and Dzogchen believe awareness – pure awareness, rigpa, is the uncreated, unconditioned Buddha Nature, Tathagatagarbha. How can they both be right? | |ArticleContent=IIn this article Joseph Goldstein, a very experienced and influential Insight meditation teacher, explores his confusion about the apparent difference of opinion between different schools of Theravada Buddhism, Korean Ch’an and Dzogchen on the status of consciousness / awareness. His own tradition teaches consciousness is something transitory whilst Ch’an and Dzogchen believe awareness – pure awareness, rigpa, is the uncreated, unconditioned Buddha Nature, Tathagatagarbha. How can they both be right? | ||
[https://bath-bristol-mindfulness-courses.co.uk/the-nivana-debate-joseph-goldstein-extract/ Read more here...] | [https://bath-bristol-mindfulness-courses.co.uk/the-nivana-debate-joseph-goldstein-extract/ Read more here . . .] | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 12:26, 10 March 2020
The Nirvana Debate – Joseph Goldstein extract
Joseph Goldstein
2014/05/28
Article
Article