(Created page with "{{Book |BookPerson={{Book-person |PersonPage=Jones, Christopher |PersonName=Christopher V. Jones }} |FullTextRead=No |AddRelatedTab=No }}") |
No edit summary |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Book | {{Book | ||
|TileDescription=A methodical examination of Indian teaching about the ''tathāgatagarbha'' (“Buddha-nature”) and foundational Buddhist teachings about 'not-self' (''anātman''). In 2021 ''The Buddhist Self'' was awarded the Toshihide Numata Book Award. | |||
|BookPerson={{Book-person | |BookPerson={{Book-person | ||
|PersonPage=Jones, Christopher | |PersonPage=Jones, Christopher | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|FullTextRead=No | |FullTextRead=No | ||
|VideoService=youtube | |||
|VideoId=Iu1YnEaEvWo | |||
|BookToc=**{{i|ACKNOWLEDGMENTS|XI}} | |||
**{{i|ABBREVIATIONS|VIII}} | |||
**{{i|CONVENTIONS|XVII}} | |||
*{{i|1 Introduction|1}} | |||
**{{i|1.1 Self and Not-Self in Early Buddhism|1}} | |||
**{{i|1.2 ''Tathāgatagarbha'' Literature in Overview|11}} | |||
**{{i|1.3 Essences, Natures, Wombs, and Chambers|14}} | |||
**{{i|1.4 Buddhist ''Ātmavāda:'' Preliminary Thoughts|21}} | |||
'''Part I: Buddha-Nature, the Self'''<br> | |||
*{{i|2 The ''Mahāparinirvāṇamahāsūtra'' and the Buddhist Self|29}} | |||
**{{i|2.1 The Text|29}} | |||
**{{i|2.2 The Buddha as Self|33}} | |||
**{{i|2.3 Buddha-nature and the Self|40}} | |||
**{{i|2.4 Contentions and Clarifications|47}} | |||
**{{i|2.5 The True Self and False Notions of It|55}} | |||
**{{i|2.6 Self and Absence of Self|59}} | |||
**{{i|2.7 Buddha-nature in Dharmakṣema's MPNMSD+ |62}} | |||
**{{i|2.8 Conclusions|67}} | |||
*{{i|3 The ''Aṅgulimālīyasūtra'' and the Essential Self|70}} | |||
**{{i|3.1 The Text|70}} | |||
**{{i|3.2 An "Essence" of One's Own|74}} | |||
**{{i|3.3 What Buddha-nature Is Not: More False Notions of the Self|77}} | |||
**{{i|3.4 Perceiving Buddha-nature|79}} | |||
**{{i|3.5 Essence, Action, and the Self|83}} | |||
**{{i|3.6 A "Single Essence"|87}} | |||
**{{i|3. 7 Buddhism contra Other Systems|91}} | |||
**{{i|3.8 Conclusions|95}} | |||
*{{i|4 The ''Mahābherīhārakasūtra'' and Liberation of the Self|97}} | |||
**{{i|4.1 The Text|97}} | |||
**{{i|4.2 Continuity of the Self|100}} | |||
**{{i|4.3 The Sovereign Self|104}} | |||
**{{i|4.4 Buddha-nature and Buddhist Practice|107}} | |||
**{{i|4.5 Self, Not-Self, and Emptiness|109}} | |||
**{{i|4.6 Conclusions|114}} | |||
'''Part II: Buddha-nature, Not Self''' | |||
*{{i|5 The ''Śrīmālādevīsiṃhanādasūtra'' and the Perfection of Self|119}} | |||
**{{i|5.1 The Text|119}} | |||
**{{i|5.2 Reimagining ''Tathāgatagarbha''|122}} | |||
**{{i|5.3 The ''Dharmakāya'' and Its Qualities|129}} | |||
**{{i|5.4 On "Singularity"|132}} | |||
**{{i|5.5 Conclusions|136}} | |||
*{{i|6 Other ''Tathāgatagarbha'' Sources|139}} | |||
**{{i|6.1 The ''Anūnatvāpūrṇatvānirdeśaparivarta''|139}} | |||
**{{i|6.2 The ''Tathāgatagarbhasūtra''|143}} | |||
**{{i|6.3 The ''Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra''|148}} | |||
*{{i|7 The ''Ratnagotravibhāga'' and the Self That Is No Self|154}} | |||
**{{i|7.1 The Text|154}} | |||
**{{i|7.2 Buddha-nature and the "Basic" RGV|158}} | |||
**{{i|7.3 "Perfection of Self' in the RGVV|167}} | |||
**{{i|7.4 ''Tathāgatagarbha'' as, Once Again, the Self|175}} | |||
**{{i|7.5 Conclusions|178}} | |||
*{{i|8 The ''Laṅkāvatārasūtra'' and Rejecting the Buddhist Self|181}} | |||
**{{i|8.1 The Text|181}} | |||
**{{i|8.2 ''Tathāgatagarbha'' and Absence of Self|183}} | |||
**{{i|8.3 The ''"Ālayavijñāna-Tathāgatagarbha"''|188}} | |||
**{{i|8.4 Selfhood in the ''Sagāthaka''|191}} | |||
**{{i|8.5 Conclusions|194}} | |||
**{{i|8.6 Postscript: After the LAS|195}} | |||
'''Part III: Buddha-nature Reconsidered'''<br> | |||
*{{i|9 Recurring Themes and Motifs|203}} | |||
**{{i|9.1 The Single Vehicle|203}} | |||
**{{i|9.2 "Cryptic" Utterances|210}} | |||
**{{i|9.3 The Intrinsically Pure Mind|214}} | |||
**{{i|9.4 "Sarvalokapriyadarśana"|217}} | |||
**{{i|9.5 Emptiness and Nonemptiness|218}} | |||
**{{i|9.6 Non-Buddhists and Their Teachings|223}} | |||
*{{i|10 Evolution of the Buddhist Self|229}} | |||
**{{i|10.1 The Course of Buddha-nature Teaching|229}} | |||
**{{i|10.2 Origins of the Buddha-nature Idea|237}} | |||
**{{i|10.3 Liberation and the Self|245}} | |||
**{{i|10.4 Buddhist Selfhood and the Mahāyāna|253}} | |||
**{{i|10.5 Closing Thoughts|261}} | |||
**{{i|REFERENCES|265}} | |||
**{{i|INDEX|287}} | |||
|PublisherLogo=File:University of Hawai'i Press Logo.png | |||
|ExtraCategories=University of Hawai'i Press | |||
|StopPersonRedirects=No | |||
|AddRelatedTab=No | |AddRelatedTab=No | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:41, 22 September 2021
The assertion that there is nothing in the constitution of any person that deserves to be considered the self (ātman)—a permanent, unchanging kernel of personal identity in this life and those to come—has been a cornerstone of Buddhist teaching from its inception. Whereas other Indian religious systems celebrated the search for and potential discovery of one’s “true self,” Buddhism taught about the futility of searching for anything in our experience that is not transient and ephemeral. But a small yet influential set of Mahāyāna Buddhist texts, composed in India in the early centuries CE, taught that all sentient beings possess at all times, and across their successive lives, the enduring and superlatively precious nature of a Buddha. This was taught with reference to the enigmatic expression tathāgatagarbha—the “womb” or “chamber” for a Buddha—which some texts refer to as a person’s true self.
The Buddhist Self is a methodical examination of Indian teaching about the tathāgatagarbha (otherwise the presence of one's “Buddha-nature”) and the extent to which different Buddhist texts and authors articulated this in terms of the self. C. V. Jones attends to each of the Indian Buddhist works responsible for explaining what is meant by the expression tathāgatagarbha, and how far this should be understood or promoted using the language of selfhood. With close attention to these sources, Jones argues that the trajectory of Buddha-nature thought in India is also the history and legacy of a Buddhist account of what deserves to be called the self: an innovative attempt to equip Mahāyāna Buddhism with an affirmative response to wider Indian interest in the discovery of something precious or even divine in one's own constitution. This argument is supplemented by critical consideration of other themes that run through this distinctive body of Mahāyānist literature: the relationship between Buddhist and non-Buddhist teachings about the self, the overlap between the tathāgatagarbha and the nature of the mind, and the originally radical position that the only means of becoming liberated from rebirth is to achieve the same exalted status as the Buddha. (Source: University of Hawai'i Press)
| Citation | Jones, Christopher V. The Buddhist Self: On Tathāgatagarbha and Ātman. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 2020. |
|---|---|
