No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Book | {{Book | ||
|FullTextRead=No | |FullTextRead=No | ||
|BookToc=**{{i|''Preface''|xi}} | |BookToc=**{{i|''Preface''|xi}} | ||
**{{i|''Acknowledgments''|xv}}<br><br> | **{{i|''Acknowledgments''|xv}}<br><br> | ||
**{{i|'''Thematic introduction: a Buddhist critique of the construction of self and world'''|1}}<br><br> | **{{i|'''Thematic introduction: a Buddhist critique of<br>the construction of self and world'''|1}}<br><br> | ||
*{{i|'''PART I'''<br>'''The background and context of the ālaya-vijñāna'''|7}}<br><br> | *{{i|'''PART I'''<br>'''The background and context of the ālaya-vijñāna'''|7}}<br><br> | ||
*{{i|'''1 The early Buddhist background'''|9}} | *{{i|'''1 The early Buddhist background'''|9}} | ||
*{{i|''The three marks of existence''|9}} | |||
*{{i|''The formula of dependent arising''|11}} | |||
**{{i|Causation and continuity without a self|16}} | |||
*{{i|''Viññāṇa in the formula of dependent arising''|19}} | |||
**{{i|Viññāṇa as consciousness|21}} | |||
**{{i|Viññāṇa as cognitive awareness|28}} | |||
*{{i|''The underlying tendencies'' (anusaya)|33}} | |||
**{{i|The underlying tendency "I am" and conceptual proliferation (''papañca'')|36}} | |||
**{{i|The debate over latent versus manifest|39}} | |||
*{{i|''Reciprocal causality between the two aspects of viññāṇa''|41}}<br><br> | |||
*{{i|2 '''The Abhidharma context'''|46}} | *{{i|2 '''The Abhidharma context'''|46}} | ||
The Abhidharma project and its problematic 46 | *{{i|''The Abhidharma project and its problematic''|46}} | ||
Background of the Abhidharma 47 | **{{i|Background of the Abhidharma|47}} | ||
The aim and methods of Abhidharma: dharma as | *{{i|''The aim and methods of Abhidharma:'' dharma ''as irreducible unit of experience''|50}} | ||
irreducible unit of experience 50 | *{{i|''The basic problematic: two levels of discourse, two dimensions of mind''|55}} | ||
*{{i|''Analysis of mind and its mental factors''|57}} | |||
**{{i|The initial formulation of the problematic in its synchronic dimension: the accumulation of karmic potential, the presence of the underlying tendencies,<br>and their gradual purification in the ''Kathāvatthu''|59}} | |||
**{{i|The problematic in its diachronic dimension: immediate succession versus the continuity of karmic potential|62}} | |||
*{{i|''The persistence of traditional continuities: karma and kleśa in the'' Abhidharma-kośa|67}} | |||
*{{i|''Abhidharmic responses to the problematic''|70}} | |||
**{{i|The Sarvāstivādin theory of possession (''prāpti'')|72}} | |||
**{{i|The Sautrāntika theory of seeds (''bīja'') in the mental stream (''santāna'')|73}} | |||
*{{i|''Questions raised by consciousness, seeds, and the mental stream''|76}} | |||
*{{i|''The Theravadin theory of life-constituent mind'' (bhavaṅga-citta)|81}} | |||
*{{i|''Conclusion''|85}}<br><br> | |||
The | *{{i|'''PART II<br>The ālaya-vijñāna in the Yogācāra tradition'''|89}}<br><br> | ||
*{{i|'''3 The ālaya-vijñana in the early tradition'''|91}} | |||
*{{i|''The origins of the ālaya-vijñāna''|91}} | |||
The | *{{i|''The new model of mind in the'' Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra|94}} | ||
**{{i|The ālaya-vijñāna as mental stream|99}} | |||
*{{i|''The'' Ālaya Treatise ''of the'' Yogācārabhūmi|101}} | |||
**{{i|The ''Proof Portion''|102}} | |||
The | *{{i|''The'' Alaya Treatise, Pravṛtti Portion: ''analyzing the ālaya-vijñāna in Abhidharmic<br>terms''|107}} | ||
**{{i|The ālaya-vijñāna's subliminal objective supports and cognitive processes|109}} | |||
**{{i|The ālaya-vijñāna's mutual and simultaneous relationship with manifest<br>cognitive awareness (''pravṛtti-vijñāna'')|112}} | |||
The | **{{i|The ālaya-vijñāna's simultaneous arising with (afflictive) mentation|117}} | ||
*{{i|''The'' Ālaya Treatise, Nivṛtti Portion: ''equating the ālaya-vijñāna with saṃsāric<br>continuity''|123}} | |||
Abhidharmic | *{{i|''Conclusion''|127}}<br><br> | ||
The | |||
The | |||
Conclusion | |||
*'''4 The ālaya-vijñāna in the ''Mahāyāna-saṃgraha'' '''<br> | |||
The | *{{i|'''1. bringing it all back home'''|128}} | ||
*{{i|''Appropriating the traditional Buddhist framework''|129}} | |||
**{{i|Synonyms of the ālaya-vijñāna in the disciple’s vehicle|130}} | |||
The | **{{i|The two vijñanas and the two dependent arisings|131}} | ||
**{{i|Seeding the ālaya-vijñāna: the karmic process as simultaneous intrapsychic causality|135}} | |||
*{{i|''Resolving the Abhidharmic Problematic''|139}} | |||
**{{i|Karma, rebirth, and the ālaya-vijñāna|140}} | |||
**{{i|The continuity of the afflictions (''kleśa'')|142}} | |||
**{{i|The path of purification: mundane and supramundane|150}} | |||
The | *{{i|''Beyond Abhidharma: adventitious defilements, pure seeds, and luminous minds''|153}}<br><br> | ||
The | |||
The | *'''5 The ālaya-vijñāna in the ''Mahāyāna-saṃgraha'' '''<br> | ||
*{{i|'''2. looking beyond'''|158}} | |||
*{{i|''The predispositions of speech, self-view, and the life-constituents''|159}} | |||
*{{i|''Common experience, common embodiment: language, the ālaya-vijñana, and "the arising<br>of the world"''|160}}<br><br> | |||
*{{i|'''PART III<br>Appendices'''|171}}<br><br> | |||
*{{i|Appendix I The series of dependent arising: affliction, action, and their<br>results|173}} | |||
*{{i|Appendix II Index of related controversies|175}} | |||
*{{i|Appendix III Translation: the ''Pravṛtti'' and ''Nivṛtti Portions'' of the<br>''Viniścayasaṃgrahaṇī'' of the ''Yogācārabhūmi''|178}}<br><br> | |||
**{{i|''Notes''|190}} | |||
**{{i|''Bibliography of works cited''|247}} | |||
**{{i|''Index of texts quoted''|255}} | |||
**{{i|''Index''|259}} | |||
PART III | |||
Appendices 171 | |||
Appendix I The series of dependent arising: affliction, | |||
action, and their results 173 | |||
Appendix II Index of related controversies 175 | |||
Appendix III Translation: the | |||
the | |||
Notes 190 | |||
Bibliography of works cited 247 | |||
Index of texts quoted 255 | |||
Index 259 | |||
|AddRelatedTab=No | |AddRelatedTab=No | ||
|PublisherLogo=File:Routledge logo.png | |||
|StopPersonRedirects=No | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 17:58, 18 September 2020
This is the story of fifth century CE India, when the Yogacarin Buddhists tested the awareness of unawareness, and became aware of human unawareness to an extraordinary degree. They not only explicitly differentiated this dimension of mental processes from conscious cognitive processes, but also offered reasoned arguments on behalf of this dimension of mind. This is the concept of the 'Buddhist unconscious', which arose just as philosophical discourse in other circles was fiercely debating the limits of conscious awareness, and these ideas in turn had developed as a systematisation of teachings from the Buddha himself. For us in the twenty-first century, these teachings connect in fascinating ways to the Western conceptions of the 'cognitive unconscious' which have been elaborated in the work of Jung and Freud.
This important study reveals how the Buddhist unconscious illuminates and draws out aspects of current western thinking on the unconscious mind. One of the most intriguing connections is the idea that there is in fact no substantial 'self' underlying all mental activity; 'the thoughts themselves are the thinker'. William S. Waldron considers the implications of this radical notion, which, despite only recently gaining plausibility, was in fact first posited 2,500 years ago. (Source: Routledge)
Citation | Waldron, William S. The Buddhist Unconscious: The Ālaya-Vijñāna in the Context of Indian Buddhist Thought. Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003. http://abhidharma.ru/A/Raznoe/0061.pdf. |
---|---|